
State Universities Annuitants Association
A Brief Note to All University Members
December 3, 2009
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the ASFCME website dated
December 1, 2009:
Arbitrator rejects grievance over retiree dental contributions
AFSCME has received Arbitrator Gibbons’ decision concerning the State’s
unilateral imposition of an $11.00 per month retiree contribution for dental
insurance. Unfortunately, Arbitrator Gibbons found in favor of the
State.
The arbitrator ignored the long history of the parties bargaining over
retiree health insurance, and of arbitrators enforcing the agreed upon
contractual provisions. Instead the arbitrator focused on the question of
whether the collective bargaining agreement’s grievance procedure allowed the
Union to process grievances on behalf of retirees.
The union presented evidence that the parties had bargained over
retiree health and dental insurance since 1985, and had included language
concerning retirees in successive collective bargaining agreements. Prior
arbitration decisions have supported the union’s right to enforce provisions
related to retirees through the grievance procedure and, ultimately, through
arbitration.
In spite of what the union’s attorneys believe is clear language
allowing the union to enforce the contract through arbitration on behalf of
retirees, Arbitrator Gibbons ruled that because retirees are not employees and
therefore not members of a bargaining unit, “the grievance arbitration process
is foreclosed to them and instead retirees and their survivors must consider
other appropriate venues if they wish to challenge the Employer’s actions in
regard to their negotiated benefits contained in the Collective Bargaining
Agreement.”
AFSCME’s attorneys believe that the arbitration decision is seriously
flawed. They are continuing to review both the decision itself and other
legal precedents, and to assess what other legal options may be available.